Difference between revisions of "AI Research"
From WikiDreams
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* they estimated what was technically possible | * they estimated what was technically possible | ||
| − | + | [https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/the-risk-of-automation-for-jobs-in-oecd-countries_5jlz9h56dvq7-en Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis] [https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5jlz9h56dvq7-en.pdf?expires=1579994523&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=8D60E1D8AFF097526917DDB6DD9A24DD (pdf)] - 2016 - OECD <br> | |
* task-based approach | * task-based approach | ||
* 9 percent of jobs in U.S. were at high risk for automation | * 9 percent of jobs in U.S. were at high risk for automation | ||
** based on at least 70% of the jobs task could be automated | ** based on at least 70% of the jobs task could be automated | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 25 January 2020
Future of Employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization - 2013 - Oxford University
- Author's - Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A Osborn
- 47 percent of U.S. jobs could be automated within the next decade or two
- occupation-based evaluation
- evaluated the likelihood that 71 occupations could be automated
- modeled the impact on 632 additional occupations
- they estimated what was technically possible
Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis (pdf) - 2016 - OECD
- task-based approach
- 9 percent of jobs in U.S. were at high risk for automation
- based on at least 70% of the jobs task could be automated
